Revision Isn’t Always Renovation

Revision Isn’t Always Renovation

Revision Isn’t Always Renovation

If you’d like to receive my blog in your in-box each week, click here.

I had a consultation this week with an author about her current manuscript we’ve been working on together.

She was frustrated because despite her intensive work on revisions, the story isn’t yet coming together as effectively as it could. She was feeling discouraged, wondering if she should just scrap it and start over, or give up on telling the story the way she envisioned and hopes to tell it.

Read more: “How Not to Hate Editing Your Writing”

I told her this story: Last weekend I went shopping with a girlfriend looking for a new sofa and chairs for her living room. As pretty much always happens to me when I browse furniture stores, I got my head turned by the gorgeous displays throughout the store, so many of them deliciously inviting, carefully curated and arranged for maximum aesthetic appeal.

I got home and, also as I often do, immediately began gauging my own living room through the lens of the ones I just seen, feeling frustrated that mine just didn’t have that same aesthetic appeal.

This living room has been a bit of a vexation to me for quite a while. As I wrote not long ago, like the rest of my house it’s filled with individual pieces I love, but the overall effect isn’t nearly as polished and appealing as what I’d seen in the furniture store. The room is a slightly awkward layout, an open floor plan with a corner fireplace and a TV alcove, which limits how I can place the furniture and what size rug I can accommodate in the room.

My initial impulse was to scrap it all and start over from scratch, but besides the fact that my husband’s head would fly clean off his neck if I proposed replacing our “perfectly good furniture” with all new, I realized I already had most of the ingredients I needed to create the living space I wanted. I just had to rearrange a bit.

I repositioned the rug, making the furniture and the whole room feel less cramped. I moved the furniture—not much, just a foot or two with various pieces, and changed the angles a little bit. I did what I call “shopping the house,” where I roam through every closet and every room in search of decor items I can swap around, and relocated art, blankets, side tables, and accessories.

Once I had all that in place it was easy to see what I actually needed to add or replace: some additional lighting, possibly a new ottoman, and a couple of throw pillows to tie the colors together a little more. I had originally thought to replace the area rug, currently a very bold red-orange, with something more neutral and potentially elegant, but I love that rug. It may not be to everyone’s taste, but it certainly is to mine, and it brings a lot of life and color into the house and ties together a cohesive color scheme from room to room.

Is it magazine-cover perfect? I doubt it. But it now looks more appealing and inviting—and most important, it suits me and feels like a room I want to spend time in.

Which brings me back to the author I spoke with last week. Like me, she already had most of the ingredients to create the story she wants to tell. She doesn’t need to start over; the core story is well developed, layered and complex, and deeply interesting.

She just needs to rearrange a bit.

How to Refresh and Redecorate Your Manuscript

Just as with refreshing your home, making your manuscript more effective usually starts with looking at it with a fresh eye. Before you can plunge into making changes it’s crucial to understand what you already have—the essential “editing” stage of editing and revising. What’s working really well—and what parts have always bugged you? Start there, and then see if making a few minor changes in certain areas could bring the entire thing together.

Read more: “Please Don’t Revise Your Manuscript!”

Accessorize: Rather than reinventing the story or major aspects of it, often strengthening a story involves expanding or developing more deeply what’s already there. Do readers need a keener understanding of the character’s motivations, perhaps, or more specific, concrete context on their history or current situation? Do you need to put more of a key relationship on the page—the characters’ interactions, reactions to one another, the impact they have on each other and their actions? If I had a dollar for every comment I’ve ever made that involves mining out more depth and detail in an author’s manuscript, I’d be a wealthy editor.

Declutter: Sometimes a story may have the opposite problem: There’s too much going on. An author can often make big improvements in a story by clearing some things out rather than adding more “stuff.” Where could you streamline and tighten? With past edits I’ve bullet-pointed out all the main plot points of an author’s story, for instance, to illustrate how much is going on and where the story may be losing its focus, getting weighed down, or simply feeling cluttered. You could also try making a list of the dramatis personae. In either case, could you whittle down the events or characters in the story and give the remaining ones more substance? Do you have scenes that duplicate already established dynamics or don’t move the story forward that you could cut, or ones that might go on too long that could be trimmed?

Try something new: Sometimes just changing out an area rug or painting a wall can transform a room. If something isn’t quite working in your story, consider changing a key element that might make a big impact. What if your character is actually married to her love interest, or their relationship is faltering—does that change the stakes, perhaps? What if the antagonist isn’t all bad—if in fact the protagonist feels connected to them on some level, even sharing some of their views? Could two key supporting characters be more effectively combined into one? It’s easy to get settled into what you have—ask me how many years I’ve lived with a living room that just wasn’t doing it for me. But before you take everything out and start over, see if simply making one impactful change could pull the whole thing together.

Change the focal point: One thing that can weaken a story’s effectiveness is having important events take place “offstage,” out of the reader’s view, which leaves them hearing about key developments secondhand and after the fact. Often I’ll suggest an author “move the camera”: Put the action on the page so readers can live it directly with the character, increasing its impact, immediacy, and reader engagement. Or could changing a point of view make a difference? I don’t mean the relatively cosmetic change of simply choosing another POV voice (switching from limited-third to first-person, for instance), although a change like that can sometimes bring a story to life, but also reconsidering the perspective(s) from which you’re telling the story. Once, for instance, I worked with an author who told her story from the perspectives of a sister and brother, but the story seemed to be much more about the relationship between the sister and her love interest. I suggested changing the main-POV characters to them to bring the story more cohesively together.

Rearrange the furniture: Sometimes an author may have all the right ingredients for an effective story; they just aren’t yet working together as effectively as they could. An author I worked with once transformed her story and gave it much more momentum and impact by taking what had been two completely separated storylines (one character’s story unfolding in part one and the other in part two) and alternating them instead. In various manuscripts I’ve suggested moving certain events later; moving them earlier; condensing or reworking the timeline; giving key actions to a different character; and shifting a character’s main motivation or goal, among other rearrangements.

Read more: “Anatomy of a Revision—Or, Surmounting the Suck

Think of this kind of approach to revising a story as experimenting—nothing is lost by trying something new with your existing setup before you decide to make any major renovations, if the pieces are in good shape and you still like them. Always save iterations of your manuscript as a safety net—if you hate something or it doesn’t work, you can easily revert to the older version.

And if you need some help assessing what’s working and what might not be as effective as you hoped, you might find my extensive Self-editing Checklist helpful.

Over to you, authors: Have you felt daunted before by the prospect of revising your story? How do you approach editing and revision?

If you’d like to receive my blog in your in-box each week, click here.

10 Comments. Leave new

  • I forget that all writers go through the stress and strain of revising and editing. So, this article today is helpful as I think about my future revisions and edits. I wonder if accepting that the revision and editing process (and all its headaches or joys) is part of being a writer. It’s not something I keep in mind, but I will work to remember that all of this goes with being a writer. I can accept it or fight it. For many years I taught college math, and I knew I couldn’t reach every student–some didn’t want to be there and for some math would always be a struggle. But I supported those who struggled, and often they were the students who didn’t quit and made the greatest gains. They took things one step at a time, focusing on what gave the most trouble first and then the rest usually fell into place. And the joy on their faces when everything clicked and the joy I felt for them is something I will always remember. We writers need to give ourselves the same grace. We deserve it!!

    Reply
    • I often say that editing and revision is actually the main work of writing. So often the craft of writing is taught as if it’s just drafting, but that’s just the first step. It does help to know what going in–adjusts our expectations so that we aren’t daunted when we realize the draft we worked so hard on may still need a fair amount of development.

      I love your parallel with your students who struggled. The hardest A I ever earned was in Chemistry–and to this day it’s the one I’m proudest of, because man, did I work for it! (Stoichiometry, WTF, amiright?!). 🙂

      I’ve gotten better at grace, as you say–and faith: I know that even if I’m struggling with something, if I just keep plugging away I will eventually figure it out. It took a while to get there, though, rather then feeling derailed or discouraged by those struggles. Thanks for the comment!

      Reply
  • That illustrative photo! Yes, I did that! The new novel is more structurally sound and less cluttered. More work remains, but I like it.

    Reply
  • I am going through this struggle right now–what to prop up–what to add, and what to cut to make room for it. My ADHD makes every decision feel like a matter of life or death. (I guess for some of my characters, it just might be!)

    Story after story, I keep winding up at the same spot–at a dark, lonely dead end with this axe-wielding story killer who’s waiting to chop off my head. He rolls his eyes and says, “Oh, it’s you again.”

    Yeah. Because I’ve learned that the process is where the answers are. To get somewhere new, I have to learn to build a better road.

    And I’m not alone. Thank you for the inspiration.

    The self-editing checklist is a wonderful tool!

    Reply
    • I love the violent and dark metaphors we writers use to describe this pursuit we allegedly love. (“Open a vein and bleed…”) The ax killer is new, though…. 😉

      I’m delighted to hear the Self-editing checklist is useful! Thanks, Robin.

      Reply
  • Christine DeSmet
    February 12, 2026 3:48 pm

    I love these suggestions. I’m an author as well as a writing instructor and developmental editor–who is working on Book 3 of a new series of my own and having doubts about the “layout of the room” or story. I’m very conscious of characters who seem interesting to the author because they “go there, go here, go there” to new rooms, and it seems connected; after all it’s all inside the same house. But we’re also just wandering inside the house. You made me think more deeply: What’s meaningful about being IN the “house” or plot? Return to the living room and reconnect with my plot in a new way. Thanks as always for a stimulating post!

    Reply
    • Love that analogy, Christine–it’s a good description for issues you’re describing that I do see fairly often: It’s all related, but not intrinsic or directly germane to the main story. I wrote about that idea not long ago in the cohesion post. Glad the post sparked something useful in your own revisions–thanks for the comment!

      Reply
  • Jeff Shakespeare, PhD
    February 12, 2026 5:25 pm

    Your analogy of a living room as a story is brilliant, Tiffany. Although, I sometimes feel deck chairs on the Titanic might be a better analogy for my stories. One thing that strikes me with the painful process of editing is how the beauty of the room is in the eye of the beholder. My struggle is to arrange the room so that, even though my own view is positive, others will find it pleasing as well. As a novelist wanna be, I think being male is a serious handicap. Data shows that almost twice as many women as men read fiction novels. And my wife and I rarely agreed on the optimum decor of our living room. But if I try to imagine what readers want, it cramps my creative style. I’m trying to deal with that by having most of my beta readers as women. For me, writing is a very challenging endeavor, but lots of fun.
    Thank you so much for your post today. It is very encouraging and enlightening.

    Reply
    • Oh, Jeff, bless you, sometimes the way you talk about your writing makes me sad–I want you to be its champion! God knows we all have to be in this challenging business.

      You’re right about the subjectivity, though, from reader to reader–and that there’s no “right” way to revise a story, neither in the author’s approach nor the effect on the story. I often tell writers that we can figure out how to make most anything work; I will point out what I think would strengthen a story or close up holes, trying to be true to the author’s vision, but there are always so many other ways to accomplish similar ends, depending on what the author wants. And two authors could create completely different stories from revising the exact same manuscript.

      I agree with your characterization of this weird craft we’re in: challenging but fun. Maybe the latter because of the former…? 🙂 Thanks for the comment.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Jeff Shakespeare, PhD Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Previous Post
Writers: Dissect Your DNFs
Next Post
The Carrot and the Stick