Starting Your Story in the Right Place to Hook Readers

Starting Your Story in the Right Place to Hook Readers

Story openings can be vexing—it’s tricky to give readers enough of a hook to invest them while avoiding layering in too much extraneous info and making the story feel slow to kick off. Strong openings are a balancing act—and one where even the most experienced writers can lose their footing.

Recently I’ve been editing an earlier novel of mine, Heart Conditions (I write fiction under a pen name, Phoebe Fox), in preparation for its rerelease, and as I read it for the first time in five years I was dismayed to see the story failed to engage me for far too many pages. The opening was slow, static, and lacked a strong hook.

I’ll dedicate a future post directly to specific techniques for hooking readers in a story, but in general an effective story opening should accomplish several things:

  1. Give readers a reason to relate to and invest in your characters
  2. Create a conflict, obstacle, friction, challenge, etc., that jolts the character from her status quo
  3. Create strong momentum that builds throughout the story

I usually advise opening as close as possible to the story’s inciting event—meaning the thing that sets the character on her journey, makes it inevitable—while still accomplishing all three of the above key elements. And in my story I did that: the first scene ends with the return after two years of the protagonist’s ex-fiance who abandoned her a month before their wedding, the event that forces her onto the path she walks throughout the story.

But my opening had problems. That initial scene was an “establishing scene”—one whose only story purpose was to introduce a situation and/or characters, rather than one that moved the story forward. It had an internal character conflict, but little story conflict that would force Brook, the protagonist, out of her situation and drive the momentum.

Then after that little flare of an inciting event, I immediately detoured into establishing more backstory with six (!!) additional scenes and three chapters that failed to move the story forward before I finally—finally—got the story moving, on page 26. But only after including another version of the inciting event, which was unnecessary and repetitious, and all before the reader was hooked—before our feet were firmly planted in the protagonist and the immediate situation/conflict she was facing.

I’ve seen countless authors fall prey to some version of this exact same misstep, and I can understand why (firsthand). It’s so tempting to believe that readers need to know certain information in order to hook into the story and feel invested. And Heart Conditions is the third book in a series (the Breakup Doctor series), which can make that temptation even stronger—when I wrote it I remember feeling mindful of offering enough information from the previous books to orient both new and forgetful returning readers to the story and characters.

Here’s the “X-ray” breakdown of the first three chapters, scene by scene, as they were initially published. Brook is the protag, known as the Breakup Doctor for her practice counseling people through bad breakups. She’s still in love with Ben, her most recent ex who is now dating Pamela after Brook broke his heart…because Brook hasn’t healed from her own heartbreak two years ago, when her ex-fiancé Michael jilted her a month before their wedding.

Chapter one

Scene one: Brook sees Ben and pines for him when they meet for him to give his dog to Brook to take care of while he’s out of town with his new girlfriend.

Scene two: Brook drives home and feeds the dog; her doorbell rings and it’s Michael.

Chapter two

Scene one: Michael breakup backstory. He asks to have a chance to talk to Brook and she punts, saying maybe another time and sending Michael away.

Scene two: Interiority about Brook’s reactions, a bit more backstory. Talks over her feelings with her best friend, Sasha.

Scene three: Sasha takes Brook on a long shopping-and-makeover montage to prepare to see Michael.

Chapter three

Scene one: Foreshadowing of Sasha subplot.

Scene two: Sunday dinner at Brook’s parents’, setting up parent subplot and Sasha subplot.

Scene three: Dinner wrap-up and more foreshadowing of Sasha subplot.

I’m a little bit embarrassed spelling these scenes this out for you, because it’s incredibly obvious looking at the breakdown how static and internal these first three chapters are. Even without knowing the story I’m guessing you see the problem—too much “establishing” info, too little forward momentum, very little conflict/tension, frontloaded backstory.

What’s the story so far? The only real inkling of action that indicates Brook’s character arc is Michael showing up and the inner conflict it causes her—but there’s no external conflict, and after that initial setup Michael disappears for more than thirty pages while the narrative keeps spinning its wheels just laying groundwork without actually moving the story forward. Some of this material is essential information, but we don’t need to have it all dumped in up front to hook us into the story—in fact it does the opposite.

How I fixed it

So in the edit for the reissue, I cut those first three chapters and made chapter four my new chapter one, which now starts with Brook actively counseling one of her Breakup Doctor clients who can’t let go of a past relationship. This directly reflects Brook’s own main conflict in the story regarding Ben that is the spine of her arc, which is much more effective storytelling—and foreshadows Michael showing up at the end of the scene, which is the inciting event.

Then I brushstroked in pieces of the essential info from the first three chapters to set up the conflicts and stakes while moving the story forward, staying with that first essential story conflict/question—between Brook and Michael—as I salted in the necessary backstory only where the reader needed it to understand whatever was happening at that point of the story (see my post on backstory here), resulting in much stronger momentum, higher tension, much more immediacy, and a tighter, stronger story structure overall.

Even as a professional editor, it’s hard to edit your own story when you’re too close to it. It wasn’t until I had the objective distance of years away from the story that I could clearly see what was hampering it. That kind of time is a luxury we rarely have, of course, but I offer an array of tips for obtaining objectivity on your own manuscripts in this Editing Quick Tip video on my YouTube channel, where I also have a video discussing this same edit. And you can do a deeper dive in my FoxPrint Working Writer online course “How to Seamlessly Weave in Backstory (While Moving Your Story Forward).”

6 Comments. Leave new

  • Susan Specht Oram
    January 14, 2021 6:35 pm

    Love this advice! Thank you!!

    Reply
  • This is endlessly fascinating, Tiffany, hearing about how an editor edits their own work! Your story sounds awesome – even with the chapters you axed. I can’t wait to read it when it comes out.

    I work in the 3-act story structure, where the inciting incident takes place around 11-13%. The thing that has helped me figure out the right beginning is to come up with my ending first. If I know what happens at the climax and resolution, I can create scenes in the beginning that mirror the end in some way, sort of like making “bookends” of the story. It seems like a common thing in films. In its own way, the inciting incident foreshadows the climax. That appears to be exactly what you’ve done with your story and its new inciting event, which asks, will they, or won’t they?

    Thank you for sharing such an insightful post, and a glimpse into your personal editing methods.

    Reply
    • Thanks, Cate–and thanks for your take on inciting events/hooks. I love seeing how different authors write and structure!

      Reply
  • I had to come back and comment on this because I recently finished Bedside Manners. There was a teaser of opening chapters of Heart Conditions before you revised it, and after buying the newest version, I had the opportunity to compare both. I was 100% hooked after reading the original version. But I loved how the tension was drawn out in so many places in the new version. It was fascinating to read both versions and see your editor’s mind at work in this post. I would love to see more posts on how you edit your own work.

    Reply
    • Tiffany Yates Martin
      May 14, 2021 8:59 pm

      Thanks, Cate! That’s so nice to hear–I did a pretty big overhaul on the rerelease and was pleased with it, and I love that it shows to readers too. 🙂 Love your idea for future posts–I’ve added it to a list I keep and will noodle on that. I approach a lot of my editing/revising on my own work very much the way I describe in my book Intuitive Editing, though. I actually created an extensive checklist for authors for editing their own work that’s also based on the kinds of things I look for–in my own work and in other authors’. You can download that on the Resources page of this site. Thanks for the comment!

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Susan Specht Oram Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Previous Post
How to Weave in Backstory without Stalling Out Your Story
Next Post
Creating Tension with Lizard-brain Writing

How Writers Revise

Menu